|
|
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ Or unordered sets:
|
|
|
Dictionaries
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Dictionaries are always a very powerful in dynamically typed languages.
|
|
|
+Dictionaries are a very powerful tool in dynamically typed languages.
|
|
|
Most programmers that come from statically typed languages (such as C++
|
|
|
or C#) ignore their existence and make their life unnecessarily more
|
|
|
difficult. This datatype is generally not present in such languages (or
|
|
|
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ statically typed language would be something like:
|
|
|
entity->smash();
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-This, way, everything that can be smashed by a rock would have to
|
|
|
+This way, everything that can be smashed by a rock would have to
|
|
|
inherit Smashable. If a character, enemy, piece of furniture, small rock
|
|
|
were all smashable, they would need to inherit from the class Smashable,
|
|
|
possibly requiring multiple inheritance. If multiple inheritance was
|
|
|
@@ -462,8 +462,9 @@ In this case, it translates to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
*"If the object can be smashed, don't care what it is, just smash it."*
|
|
|
|
|
|
-Yes, we should call it Hulk typing instead. Anyway though, there exists
|
|
|
-the possibility of the object being hit not having a smash() function.
|
|
|
+Yes, we should call it Hulk typing instead.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+It's possible that the object being hit doesn't have a smash() function.
|
|
|
Some dynamically typed languages simply ignore a method call when it
|
|
|
doesn't exist (like Objective C), but GDScript is more strict, so
|
|
|
checking if the function exists is desirable:
|
Joaquin Ruiz Luque