|
|
@@ -309,7 +309,6 @@ Defines
|
|
|
Known Issues
|
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
- we don't have authentication merging on forking
|
|
|
-- branch tid is not used yet
|
|
|
- local ACK/CANCELs copy'n'pastes Route and ignores deleted
|
|
|
Routes
|
|
|
- 6xx should be delayed
|
|
|
@@ -319,6 +318,9 @@ Known Issues
|
|
|
whether we don't need parsed headers later for something else.
|
|
|
Remember, when we now conserver a request in sh_mem, we can't apply
|
|
|
any pkg_mem operations to it any more. (that might be redesigned too)
|
|
|
+- another performance improvement may be achieved by not parsing
|
|
|
+ CSeq in replies until reply branch matches branch of an INVITE/CANCEL
|
|
|
+ in transaction table
|
|
|
- t_replicate should be done more cleanly -- Vias, Routes, etc. should
|
|
|
be removed from a message prior to replicating it
|
|
|
- SNMP support
|
Jiri Kuthan