| 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940 |
- ; RUN: llc < %s -march=nvptx -mcpu=sm_20 | FileCheck %s
- target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v16:16:16-v32:32:32-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-n16:32:64"
- @scalar1 = internal addrspace(3) global float 0.000000e+00, align 4
- @scalar2 = internal addrspace(3) global float 0.000000e+00, align 4
- ; We shouldn't sink mul.rn.f32 to BB %merge because BB %merge post-dominates
- ; BB %entry. Over-sinking created more register pressure on this example. The
- ; backend would sink the fmuls to BB %merge, but not the loads for being
- ; conservative on sinking memory accesses. As a result, the loads and
- ; the two fmuls would be separated to two basic blocks, causing two
- ; cross-BB live ranges.
- define float @post_dominate(float %x, i1 %cond) {
- ; CHECK-LABEL: post_dominate(
- entry:
- %0 = load float, float* addrspacecast (float addrspace(3)* @scalar1 to float*), align 4
- %1 = load float, float* addrspacecast (float addrspace(3)* @scalar2 to float*), align 4
- ; CHECK: ld.shared.f32
- ; CHECK: ld.shared.f32
- %2 = fmul float %0, %0
- %3 = fmul float %1, %2
- ; CHECK-NOT: bra
- ; CHECK: mul.rn.f32
- ; CHECK: mul.rn.f32
- br i1 %cond, label %then, label %merge
- then:
- %z = fadd float %x, %x
- br label %then2
- then2:
- %z2 = fadd float %z, %z
- br label %merge
- merge:
- %y = phi float [ 0.0, %entry ], [ %z2, %then2 ]
- %w = fadd float %y, %3
- ret float %w
- }
|