|
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ void Switch::onRemotePacket(const InetAddress &localAddr,const InetAddress &from
|
|
uint64_t &luts = _lastUniteAttempt[_LastUniteKey(source,destination)];
|
|
uint64_t &luts = _lastUniteAttempt[_LastUniteKey(source,destination)];
|
|
if ((now - luts) >= ZT_MIN_UNITE_INTERVAL) {
|
|
if ((now - luts) >= ZT_MIN_UNITE_INTERVAL) {
|
|
luts = now;
|
|
luts = now;
|
|
- unite(source,destination);
|
|
|
|
|
|
+ _unite(source,destination);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
} else {
|
|
} else {
|
|
#ifdef ZT_ENABLE_CLUSTER
|
|
#ifdef ZT_ENABLE_CLUSTER
|
|
@@ -590,75 +590,6 @@ void Switch::send(const Packet &packet,bool encrypt)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-bool Switch::unite(const Address &p1,const Address &p2)
|
|
|
|
-{
|
|
|
|
- if ((p1 == RR->identity.address())||(p2 == RR->identity.address()))
|
|
|
|
- return false;
|
|
|
|
- SharedPtr<Peer> p1p = RR->topology->getPeer(p1);
|
|
|
|
- if (!p1p)
|
|
|
|
- return false;
|
|
|
|
- SharedPtr<Peer> p2p = RR->topology->getPeer(p2);
|
|
|
|
- if (!p2p)
|
|
|
|
- return false;
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
- const uint64_t now = RR->node->now();
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
- std::pair<InetAddress,InetAddress> cg(Peer::findCommonGround(*p1p,*p2p,now));
|
|
|
|
- if ((!(cg.first))||(cg.first.ipScope() != cg.second.ipScope()))
|
|
|
|
- return false;
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
- TRACE("unite: %s(%s) <> %s(%s)",p1.toString().c_str(),cg.second.toString().c_str(),p2.toString().c_str(),cg.first.toString().c_str());
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
- /* Tell P1 where to find P2 and vice versa, sending the packets to P1 and
|
|
|
|
- * P2 in randomized order in terms of which gets sent first. This is done
|
|
|
|
- * since in a few cases NAT-t can be sensitive to slight timing differences
|
|
|
|
- * in terms of when the two peers initiate. Normally this is accounted for
|
|
|
|
- * by the nearly-simultaneous RENDEZVOUS kickoff from the relay, but
|
|
|
|
- * given that relay are hosted on cloud providers this can in some
|
|
|
|
- * cases have a few ms of latency between packet departures. By randomizing
|
|
|
|
- * the order we make each attempted NAT-t favor one or the other going
|
|
|
|
- * first, meaning if it doesn't succeed the first time it might the second
|
|
|
|
- * and so forth. */
|
|
|
|
- unsigned int alt = (unsigned int)RR->node->prng() & 1;
|
|
|
|
- unsigned int completed = alt + 2;
|
|
|
|
- while (alt != completed) {
|
|
|
|
- if ((alt & 1) == 0) {
|
|
|
|
- // Tell p1 where to find p2.
|
|
|
|
- Packet outp(p1,RR->identity.address(),Packet::VERB_RENDEZVOUS);
|
|
|
|
- outp.append((unsigned char)0);
|
|
|
|
- p2.appendTo(outp);
|
|
|
|
- outp.append((uint16_t)cg.first.port());
|
|
|
|
- if (cg.first.isV6()) {
|
|
|
|
- outp.append((unsigned char)16);
|
|
|
|
- outp.append(cg.first.rawIpData(),16);
|
|
|
|
- } else {
|
|
|
|
- outp.append((unsigned char)4);
|
|
|
|
- outp.append(cg.first.rawIpData(),4);
|
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
|
- outp.armor(p1p->key(),true);
|
|
|
|
- p1p->sendDirect(outp.data(),outp.size(),now,true);
|
|
|
|
- } else {
|
|
|
|
- // Tell p2 where to find p1.
|
|
|
|
- Packet outp(p2,RR->identity.address(),Packet::VERB_RENDEZVOUS);
|
|
|
|
- outp.append((unsigned char)0);
|
|
|
|
- p1.appendTo(outp);
|
|
|
|
- outp.append((uint16_t)cg.second.port());
|
|
|
|
- if (cg.second.isV6()) {
|
|
|
|
- outp.append((unsigned char)16);
|
|
|
|
- outp.append(cg.second.rawIpData(),16);
|
|
|
|
- } else {
|
|
|
|
- outp.append((unsigned char)4);
|
|
|
|
- outp.append(cg.second.rawIpData(),4);
|
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
|
- outp.armor(p2p->key(),true);
|
|
|
|
- p2p->sendDirect(outp.data(),outp.size(),now,true);
|
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
|
- ++alt; // counts up and also flips LSB
|
|
|
|
- }
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
- return true;
|
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
void Switch::requestWhois(const Address &addr)
|
|
void Switch::requestWhois(const Address &addr)
|
|
{
|
|
{
|
|
bool inserted = false;
|
|
bool inserted = false;
|
|
@@ -839,4 +770,96 @@ bool Switch::_trySend(const Packet &packet,bool encrypt)
|
|
return false;
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+bool Switch::_unite(const Address &p1,const Address &p2)
|
|
|
|
+{
|
|
|
|
+ if ((p1 == RR->identity.address())||(p2 == RR->identity.address()))
|
|
|
|
+ return false;
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ const uint64_t now = RR->node->now();
|
|
|
|
+ InetAddress *p1a = (InetAddress *)0;
|
|
|
|
+ InetAddress *p2a = (InetAddress *)0;
|
|
|
|
+ InetAddress p1v4,p1v6,p2v4,p2v6,uv4,uv6;
|
|
|
|
+ {
|
|
|
|
+ const SharedPtr<Peer> p1p(RR->topology->getPeer(p1));
|
|
|
|
+ const SharedPtr<Peer> p2p(RR->topology->getPeer(p2));
|
|
|
|
+ if ((!p1p)&&(!p2p)) return false;
|
|
|
|
+ if (p1p) p1p->getBestActiveAddresses(now,p1v4,p1v6);
|
|
|
|
+ if (p2p) p2p->getBestActiveAddresses(now,p2v4,p2v6);
|
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
|
+ if ((p1v6)&&(p2v6)) {
|
|
|
|
+ p1a = &p1v6;
|
|
|
|
+ p2a = &p2v6;
|
|
|
|
+ } else if ((p1v4)&&(p2v4)) {
|
|
|
|
+ p1a = &p1v4;
|
|
|
|
+ p2a = &p2v4;
|
|
|
|
+ } else {
|
|
|
|
+ SharedPtr<Peer> upstream(RR->topology->getUpstreamPeer());
|
|
|
|
+ if (!upstream)
|
|
|
|
+ return false;
|
|
|
|
+ upstream->getBestActiveAddresses(now,uv4,uv6);
|
|
|
|
+ if ((p1v6)&&(uv6)) {
|
|
|
|
+ p1a = &p1v6;
|
|
|
|
+ p2a = &uv6;
|
|
|
|
+ } else if ((p1v4)&&(uv4)) {
|
|
|
|
+ p1a = &p1v4;
|
|
|
|
+ p2a = &uv4;
|
|
|
|
+ } else if ((p2v6)&&(uv6)) {
|
|
|
|
+ p1a = &p2v6;
|
|
|
|
+ p2a = &uv6;
|
|
|
|
+ } else if ((p2v4)&&(uv4)) {
|
|
|
|
+ p1a = &p2v4;
|
|
|
|
+ p2a = &uv4;
|
|
|
|
+ } else return false;
|
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ TRACE("unite: %s(%s) <> %s(%s)",p1.toString().c_str(),p1a->toString().c_str(),p2.toString().c_str(),p2a->toString().c_str());
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ /* Tell P1 where to find P2 and vice versa, sending the packets to P1 and
|
|
|
|
+ * P2 in randomized order in terms of which gets sent first. This is done
|
|
|
|
+ * since in a few cases NAT-t can be sensitive to slight timing differences
|
|
|
|
+ * in terms of when the two peers initiate. Normally this is accounted for
|
|
|
|
+ * by the nearly-simultaneous RENDEZVOUS kickoff from the relay, but
|
|
|
|
+ * given that relay are hosted on cloud providers this can in some
|
|
|
|
+ * cases have a few ms of latency between packet departures. By randomizing
|
|
|
|
+ * the order we make each attempted NAT-t favor one or the other going
|
|
|
|
+ * first, meaning if it doesn't succeed the first time it might the second
|
|
|
|
+ * and so forth. */
|
|
|
|
+ unsigned int alt = (unsigned int)RR->node->prng() & 1;
|
|
|
|
+ const unsigned int completed = alt + 2;
|
|
|
|
+ while (alt != completed) {
|
|
|
|
+ if ((alt & 1) == 0) {
|
|
|
|
+ // Tell p1 where to find p2.
|
|
|
|
+ Packet outp(p1,RR->identity.address(),Packet::VERB_RENDEZVOUS);
|
|
|
|
+ outp.append((unsigned char)0);
|
|
|
|
+ p2.appendTo(outp);
|
|
|
|
+ outp.append((uint16_t)p2a->port());
|
|
|
|
+ if (p2a->isV6()) {
|
|
|
|
+ outp.append((unsigned char)16);
|
|
|
|
+ outp.append(p2a->rawIpData(),16);
|
|
|
|
+ } else {
|
|
|
|
+ outp.append((unsigned char)4);
|
|
|
|
+ outp.append(p2a->rawIpData(),4);
|
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
|
+ send(outp,true);
|
|
|
|
+ } else {
|
|
|
|
+ // Tell p2 where to find p1.
|
|
|
|
+ Packet outp(p2,RR->identity.address(),Packet::VERB_RENDEZVOUS);
|
|
|
|
+ outp.append((unsigned char)0);
|
|
|
|
+ p1.appendTo(outp);
|
|
|
|
+ outp.append((uint16_t)p1a->port());
|
|
|
|
+ if (p1a->isV6()) {
|
|
|
|
+ outp.append((unsigned char)16);
|
|
|
|
+ outp.append(p1a->rawIpData(),16);
|
|
|
|
+ } else {
|
|
|
|
+ outp.append((unsigned char)4);
|
|
|
|
+ outp.append(p1a->rawIpData(),4);
|
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
|
+ send(outp,true);
|
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
|
+ ++alt; // counts up and also flips LSB
|
|
|
|
+ }
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
|
+ return true;
|
|
|
|
+}
|
|
|
|
+
|
|
} // namespace ZeroTier
|
|
} // namespace ZeroTier
|