|
@@ -391,24 +391,15 @@ void Switch::rendezvous(const SharedPtr<Peer> &peer,const InetAddress &atAddr)
|
|
|
TRACE("sending NAT-t message to %s(%s)",peer->address().toString().c_str(),atAddr.toString().c_str());
|
|
|
const uint64_t now = RR->node->now();
|
|
|
|
|
|
- /* Attempt direct contact now unless we are IPv4 and our external ports
|
|
|
- * appear to be randomized by a NAT device. In that case, we should let
|
|
|
- * the other side send a message first. Why? If the other side is also
|
|
|
- * randomized and symmetric, we are probably going to fail. But if the
|
|
|
- * other side is "port restricted" but otherwise sane, us sending a
|
|
|
- * packet first may actually close the remote's outgoing port to us!
|
|
|
- * This assists with NAT-t in cases where one side is symmetric and the
|
|
|
- * other is full cone but port restricted. */
|
|
|
- if ((atAddr.ss_family != AF_INET)||(!RR->sa->areGlobalIPv4PortsRandomized())) {
|
|
|
+ if ((atAddr.ss_family == AF_INET)&&(RR->sa->areGlobalIPv4PortsRandomized())) {
|
|
|
peer->attemptToContactAt(RR,atAddr,now);
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
TRACE("behind randomizing symmetric NAT -- delaying initial message to %s(%s)",peer->address().toString().c_str(),atAddr.toString().c_str());
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
- // After 1s, try again and perhaps try more NAT-t strategies
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
Mutex::Lock _l(_contactQueue_m);
|
|
|
- _contactQueue.push_back(ContactQueueEntry(peer,now + ZT_NAT_T_TACTICAL_ESCALATION_DELAY,atAddr));
|
|
|
+ _contactQueue.push_back(ContactQueueEntry(peer,now + (ZT_NAT_T_TACTICAL_ESCALATION_DELAY / 2),atAddr));
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -473,10 +464,10 @@ unsigned long Switch::doTimerTasks(uint64_t now)
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
if (qi->strategyIteration == 0) {
|
|
|
- // First strategy: send packet directly (we already tried this but try again)
|
|
|
+ // First strategy: send packet directly to destination
|
|
|
qi->peer->attemptToContactAt(RR,qi->inaddr,now);
|
|
|
} else if (qi->strategyIteration <= 4) {
|
|
|
- // Strategies 1-4: try escalating ports
|
|
|
+ // Strategies 1-4: try escalating ports for symmetric NATs that remap sequentially
|
|
|
InetAddress tmpaddr(qi->inaddr);
|
|
|
int p = (int)qi->inaddr.port() + qi->strategyIteration;
|
|
|
if (p < 0xffff) {
|