|
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|
|
-*Physically Based Rendering – Part one*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+= Physically Based Rendering – Part one
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I’ve been looking at Physically Based Rendering (PBR from now on) since a few weeks, because that’s what all the cool kids are talking about these days. I read almost all the interweb about it and finally somehow wrapped my head around the mechanics behind the concept.
|
|
I’ve been looking at Physically Based Rendering (PBR from now on) since a few weeks, because that’s what all the cool kids are talking about these days. I read almost all the interweb about it and finally somehow wrapped my head around the mechanics behind the concept.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ The other common workflow is called the *Specular workflow* as it uses a specula
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now there are pro and cons on using one or the other. Here are the main points :
|
|
Now there are pro and cons on using one or the other. Here are the main points :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-**Metalness workflow :**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+== Metalness workflow :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Pros*
|
|
*Pros*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ Now there are pro and cons on using one or the other. Here are the main points :
|
|
|
* May produce some white artifacts at the junction between metal and non metal
|
|
* May produce some white artifacts at the junction between metal and non metal
|
|
|
* Harder to make implausible materials, not impossible though.
|
|
* Harder to make implausible materials, not impossible though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-**Specular workflow**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+== Specular workflow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Pros*
|
|
*Pros*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ali-RS