|
@@ -641,8 +641,11 @@ unit optloop;
|
|
|
not(lnf_backward in tfornode(n).loopflags) and
|
|
|
(lnf_dont_mind_loopvar_on_exit in tfornode(n).loopflags) and
|
|
|
is_constintnode(tfornode(n).right) and
|
|
|
- { this is not strictly necessary, but we do it for now }
|
|
|
- is_constnode(tfornode(n).t1) and
|
|
|
+ { this is not strictly necessary, but we do it for now;
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ found not case so far where it cause trouble to remove the check, so commented
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ is_constnode(tfornode(n).t1) and }
|
|
|
(([cs_check_overflow,cs_check_range]*n.localswitches)=[]) and
|
|
|
(([cs_check_overflow,cs_check_range]*tfornode(n).left.localswitches)=[]) and
|
|
|
((tfornode(n).left.nodetype=loadn) and (tloadnode(tfornode(n).left).symtableentry is tabstractvarsym) and
|