소스 검색

* moved initialisation of parentfpstruct to just behind where the local vars
get initialised, so that parameters in this struct are already available
in any wrappers generated for the parent routine (e.g. in case self is
moved to the parentfpstruct in a destructor, which calls beforestruction
in its wrapper)

git-svn-id: trunk@40384 -

Jonas Maebe 6 년 전
부모
커밋
3a5a69619e
1개의 변경된 파일16개의 추가작업 그리고 9개의 파일을 삭제
  1. 16 9
      compiler/psub.pas

+ 16 - 9
compiler/psub.pas

@@ -892,6 +892,18 @@ implementation
         addstatement(newstatement,entry_asmnode);
         cnodeutils.procdef_block_add_implicit_initialize_nodes(procdef,newstatement);
         addstatement(newstatement,init_asmnode);
+        if assigned(procdef.parentfpinitblock) then
+          begin
+            if assigned(tblocknode(procdef.parentfpinitblock).left) then
+              begin
+                { could be an asmn in case of a pure assembler procedure,
+                  but those shouldn't access nested variables }
+                addstatement(newstatement,procdef.parentfpinitblock);
+              end
+            else
+              procdef.parentfpinitblock.free;
+            procdef.parentfpinitblock:=nil;
+          end;
         addstatement(newstatement,bodyentrycode);
 
         if (cs_implicit_exceptions in current_settings.moduleswitches) and
@@ -1875,6 +1887,7 @@ implementation
          old_current_structdef: tabstractrecorddef;
          old_current_genericdef,
          old_current_specializedef: tstoreddef;
+         parentfpinitblock: tnode;
          old_parse_generic: boolean;
          recordtokens : boolean;
 
@@ -1987,16 +2000,10 @@ implementation
                begin
                  if assigned(tblocknode(procdef.parentfpinitblock).left) then
                    begin
-                     { could be an asmn in case of a pure assembler procedure,
-                       but those shouldn't access nested variables }
-                     if code.nodetype<>blockn then
-                       internalerror(2015122601);
-                     tblocknode(code).left:=cstatementnode.create(procdef.parentfpinitblock,tblocknode(code).left);
-                     do_typecheckpass(tblocknode(code).left);
+                     parentfpinitblock:=procdef.parentfpinitblock;
+                     do_typecheckpass(parentfpinitblock);
+                     procdef.parentfpinitblock:=parentfpinitblock;
                    end
-                 else
-                   procdef.parentfpinitblock.free;
-                 procdef.parentfpinitblock:=nil;
                end;
 
            end;