|
@@ -154,44 +154,58 @@
|
|
|
cntlzw r11,r3 // count leading zeroes of msw1
|
|
|
cntlzw r12,r5 // count leading zeroes of msw2
|
|
|
subi r0,r7,1 // if no overflowcheck, r0 := $ffffffff, else r0 := 0;
|
|
|
+ mr r10,r8
|
|
|
add r9,r11,r12 // sum of leading zeroes
|
|
|
or r0,r9,r0 // maximise sum if no overflow checking, otherwise it remains
|
|
|
- cmplwi cr1,r0,63 // more than 63 leading zero bits in total? If so, no overflow
|
|
|
+ cmplwi cr1,r0,64 // >= 64 leading zero bits in total? If so, no overflow
|
|
|
beq .Lmsw_zero // if both msw's are zero, skip cross products
|
|
|
mullw r7,r3,r6 // lsw of first cross-product
|
|
|
add r8,r8,r7 // add
|
|
|
- mullw r7,r4,r5 // lsw of second cross-product
|
|
|
- add r8,r8,r7 // add
|
|
|
+ mullw r5,r4,r5 // lsw of second cross-product
|
|
|
+ add r8,r8,r5 // add
|
|
|
.Lmsw_zero:
|
|
|
- mullw r7,r4,r6 // lsw of product of lsw's
|
|
|
- bge+ cr1,.LDone // if the sum of leading zero's >= 63 (or checkoverflow was 0)
|
|
|
+ bge+ cr1,.LDone // if the sum of leading zero's >= 64 (or checkoverflow was 0)
|
|
|
// there's no overflow, otherwise more thorough check
|
|
|
- subfic r0,r11,31 // if msw f1 = 0, then r0 := -1, else r9 >= 0
|
|
|
- cntlzw r4,r4 // get leading zeroes count of lsw f1
|
|
|
+ subfic r0,r11,31 // if msw f1 = 0, then r0 := -1, else r0 >= 0
|
|
|
+ cntlzw r3,r4 // get leading zeroes count of lsw f1
|
|
|
srawi r0,r0,31 // if msw f1 = 0, then r0 := 1, else r0 := 0
|
|
|
- subfic r10,r12,31 // same for f2
|
|
|
- cntlzw r6,r6
|
|
|
- srawi r10,r10,31
|
|
|
- and r4,r4,r0 // if msw f1 <> 0, the leading zero count lsw f1 := 0
|
|
|
- and r6,r6,r10 // same for f2
|
|
|
- add r9,r9,r4 // add leading zero counts of lsw's to sum if appropriate
|
|
|
- add r9,r9,r6
|
|
|
- cmplwi r9,63 // is the sum now > 63?
|
|
|
- bge .LDone
|
|
|
+ subfic r11,r12,31 // same for f2
|
|
|
+ cntlzw r12,r6
|
|
|
+ srawi r11,r11,31
|
|
|
+ and r3,r3,r0 // if msw f1 <> 0, the leading zero count lsw f1 := 0
|
|
|
+ and r12,r12,r11 // same for f2
|
|
|
+ add r9,r9,r3 // add leading zero counts of lsw's to sum if appropriate
|
|
|
+ add r9,r9,r12
|
|
|
+ cmplwi r9,64 // is the sum now >= 64?
|
|
|
+ cmplwi cr1,r9,62 // or <= 62?
|
|
|
+ bge+ .LDone // >= 64 leading zeroes -> no overflow
|
|
|
+ ble+ cr1,.LOverflow // <= 62 leading zeroes -> overflow
|
|
|
+ // for 63 zeroes, we need additional checks
|
|
|
+ add r9,r7,r5 // sum of lsw's cross products can't produce a carry,
|
|
|
+ // because the sum of leading zeroes is 63 -> at least
|
|
|
+ // one of these cross products is 0
|
|
|
+ li r0, 0
|
|
|
+ addc r9,r9,r10 // add the msw of the product of the lsw's
|
|
|
+ addze. r0,r0
|
|
|
+ beq+ .LDone
|
|
|
+ .LOverflow:
|
|
|
b FPC_OVERFLOW
|
|
|
.LDone:
|
|
|
+ mullw r4,r4,r6 // lsw of product of lsw's
|
|
|
mr r3,r8 // get msw of product in correct register
|
|
|
- mr r4,r7 // get lsw of product in correct register
|
|
|
end;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
$Log$
|
|
|
- Revision 1.3 2004-01-12 21:35:51 jonas
|
|
|
+ Revision 1.4 2004-05-29 21:35:54 jonas
|
|
|
+ * fixed overflow checking for qword multiplication
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ Revision 1.3 2004/01/12 21:35:51 jonas
|
|
|
+ assembler FPC_MUL_QWORD routine
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revision 1.2 2004/01/12 18:03:30 jonas
|
|
|
- + ppc implemetnation of fpc_mod/div_qword (from ppc compiler writers guide)
|
|
|
+ + ppc implementation of fpc_mod/div_qword (from ppc compiler writers guide)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revision 1.1 2003/09/14 11:34:13 peter
|
|
|
* moved int64 asm code to int64p.inc
|