123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137138139140141142143144145146147148149150151152153154155156157158159160161162 |
- // http://lists.freepascal.org/lists/fpc-devel/2008-June/013919.html
- // I was interested to see if bit packing works when a record member spans
- // byte boundaries, and in general it appears to work. However on my system
- // I discovered a bug that this program illustrates.
- //
- // This program demonstrates a bug using a bitpacked record where a member
- // crosses a byte boundary.
- // The record structure is (on little endian systems -- Jonas):
- // Member: | bit15_9 | bit8_1 | bit0 |
- // Bits: | 15 .. 9 | 8 .. 1 | 0 |
- // Value: | 0..127 | 0..255 | 0..1 |
- //
- // The structure is mapped to a word via a variant record for convenience.
- //
- // The limited amount of testing done indicates that the record member bit8_1
- // only causes a problem with a value of $FF, but the interesting thing is
- // that the result varies depending on other (unrelated) program structure.
- // For example the expected word result with bit 0 = 1, bits 1..9 = $FF and
- // the rest 0, should be $01FF but I have seen the correct value as well as
- // results of $0001, $0003, $0121, $012. Adding code before the tests seems
- // to change the result, possibly/ indicating that some variable or register
- // used in the bitpacking routine is not being cleared/initialized.
- //
- // Different compiler modes, optimisations, range checking were tried, but
- // the results were the same.
- //
- // Note that using a variant record to show the value is only a convenience
- // here and the error can be seen without a variant record by examining
- // the struct directly, or by overlaying the word using the absolute keyword.
- //
- // Tested on Intel Core 2 Duo running Windows XP Pro SP2, Compiler version
- // 2.2.0 [2007/09/09] and 2.3.1 [2008/02/03]
- uses SysUtils;
- type
- bit = 0..1;
- t7bit = 0..127;
- // A record to test behaviour over byte boundaries.
- BitStruct = bitpacked record
- bit0 : bit;
- bit8_1 : byte; // This set to $FF causes problems...
- bit15_9 : t7bit;
- end;
- // Map the record to a word for convenience - but overlaying
- // a word using absolute instead a variant record produces
- // the same result.
- MappedStruct = packed record
- case boolean of
- false : (AsWord : word);
- true : (AsBits : BitStruct);
- end;
- procedure TestBits;
- var
- TestLocal : MappedStruct;
- begin
- TestLocal.AsBits.bit0 := 1;
- TestLocal.AsBits.bit8_1 := $FF;
- TestLocal.AsBits.bit15_9 := $0;
- if (TestLocal.AsBits.bit0<>1) or
- (TestLocal.AsBits.bit8_1<>$ff) or
- (TestLocal.AsBits.bit15_9<>0) then
- halt(1);
- // writeln(' Expected : $01FF, Got : $',IntToHex(TestLocal.AsWord,4),' (I get $0121 V2.2.0, $0109 V2.3.1)');
- end;
- var
- TestGlobal : MappedStruct;
- begin
- //Do test in main routine - on my system results in $0001.
- // Also interesting - using 'with TestGlobal, AsBits do begin ...' instead of
- // fully qualified names returns different values in some cases.
- Writeln('Testing in main: | $00 | $FF | 1 |');
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit0 := 1;
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit8_1 := $FF;
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit15_9 := $0;
- if (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit0<>1) or
- (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit8_1<>$ff) or
- (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit15_9<>0) then
- halt(2);
- // writeln(' Expected : $01FF, Got : $',IntToHex(TestGlobal.AsWord,4), ' (I get $0001 V2.2.0, $01F9 V2.3.1)');
- // Test it in a procedure - results in $0121 on V2.2.0
- writeln;
- Writeln('Testing in procedure: | $01 | $FF | 1 |');
- TestBits;
- // Test this in main
- Writeln;
- Writeln('Back in main: | $3F | $FF | 1 |');
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit0 := 1;
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit8_1 := $FF;
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit15_9 := $3F;
- if (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit0<>1) or
- (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit8_1<>$ff) or
- (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit15_9<>$3f) then
- halt(3);
- // writeln(' Expected : $7FFF, Got : $',IntToHex(TestGlobal.AsWord,4),' ($7E01 V2.2.0, $7FF9 V2.3.1)');
- // and again in main.
- Writeln;
- Writeln('In main, | $7F | $FF | 1 |');
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit0 := 1;
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit8_1 := $FF;
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit15_9 := $7F;
- if (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit0<>1) or
- (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit8_1<>$ff) or
- (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit15_9<>$7f) then
- halt(4);
- // writeln(' Expected : $FFFF, Got : $',IntToHex(TestGlobal.AsWord,4), ' ($FE01 V.2.2.0, $FFF9 V2.3.1)');
- // Now set bits 8..1 to $FE
- Writeln;
- Writeln('Above tests, but with bits 8..1 set to $FE - all work on my system');
- Writeln(' | $00 | $FE | 1 |');
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit0 := 1;
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit8_1 := $FE;
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit15_9 := $0;
- if (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit0<>1) or
- (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit8_1<>$fe) or
- (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit15_9<>0) then
- halt(5);
- // writeln(' Expected : $01FD, Got : $',IntToHex(TestGlobal.AsWord,4));
- Writeln;
- Writeln(' | $3F | $FE | 1 |');
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit0 := 1;
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit8_1 := $FE;
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit15_9 := $3F;
- if (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit0<>1) or
- (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit8_1<>$fe) or
- (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit15_9<>$3f) then
- halt(6);
- // writeln(' Expected : $7FFD, Got : $',IntToHex(TestGlobal.AsWord,4));
- // and again in main.
- Writeln;
- Writeln(' | $7F | $FE | 1 |');
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit0 := 1;
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit8_1 := $FE;
- TestGlobal.AsBits.bit15_9 := $7F;
- if (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit0<>1) or
- (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit8_1<>$fe) or
- (TestGlobal.AsBits.bit15_9<>$7f) then
- halt(7);
- // writeln(' Expected : $FFFD, Got : $',IntToHex(TestGlobal.AsWord,4));
- end.
|