|
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
|
|
|
// C++
|
|
|
#include <algorithm>
|
|
|
#include <iostream>
|
|
|
+#include <cstdint>
|
|
|
#include <cstdio>
|
|
|
#include <cstddef>
|
|
|
#include <cmath>
|
|
@@ -136,16 +137,25 @@ static ObjectKey luax_computeloveobjectkey(lua_State *L, love::Object *object)
|
|
|
// use more than 53 bits if their alignment is guaranteed to be more than 1.
|
|
|
// For example an alignment requirement of 8 means we can shift the
|
|
|
// pointer's bits by 3.
|
|
|
- const size_t minalign = LOVE_ALIGNOF(std::max_align_t);
|
|
|
+#if UINTPTR_MAX == 0xffffffff
|
|
|
+ // https://github.com/love2d/love/issues/1916
|
|
|
+ // This appears to be ABI violation on 32-bit platforms. However it seems
|
|
|
+ // there's no reliable way to get the correct alignment pre-C++17. Consider
|
|
|
+ // that 32-bit still fits in 2^53 range, it's perfectly fine to assume
|
|
|
+ // alignment of 1.
|
|
|
+ constexpr size_t minalign = 1;
|
|
|
+#else
|
|
|
+ constexpr size_t minalign = LOVE_ALIGNOF(std::max_align_t);
|
|
|
+#endif
|
|
|
uintptr_t key = (uintptr_t) object;
|
|
|
|
|
|
if ((key & (minalign - 1)) != 0)
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
luaL_error(L, "Cannot push love object to Lua: unexpected alignment "
|
|
|
- "(pointer is %p but alignment should be %d)", object, minalign);
|
|
|
+ "(pointer is %p but alignment should be %d)", object, (int) minalign);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
- static const size_t shift = (size_t) log2(LOVE_ALIGNOF(std::max_align_t));
|
|
|
+ static const size_t shift = (size_t) log2(minalign);
|
|
|
|
|
|
key >>= shift;
|
|
|
|